The British Medical Association (BMA) has called for the use of FFP3 respirator masks in high-risk settings, to protect primary and secondary healthcare workers from the increasing risk of Covid infection. 


The association is concerned that existing PPE masks are not providing adequate protection. 


This may have relevance too for care and education service providers operating in high-risk environments/situations. Accordingly, we have produced a handy single information document containing the BMA press release, a guide to IIR and FFP masks, and details of the FFP3 models we source and supply for our charity, third sector, Local Authority and private sector customers. 


You can read and download the document here 

If you are looking to increase protection for colleagues operating in high-risk environments - particularly in the light of the continuing onslaught of the virus and its more infectious strains - FFP3 masks are definitely worth considering. 


For further information, including pricing and availability, please get in touch.  

BMA calls for urgent review of PPE guidance as provision still ‘inadequate’ and heath care workers at ‘serious risk’

by BMA media office

Press release from the BMA. 

 Location: England


 Published: Wednesday 13 January 2021


The BMA is calling on Public Health England to urgently review the adequacy of its PPE guidance for healthcare staff amid growing concerns that inadequate PPE is placing many at serious risk of Covid-19.

In a letter to PHE1, the doctors' union highlight the need for wider use of respiratory protective equipment, such as FFP3 respirators, in other high-risk settings across primary and secondary care.

Warning of the “significant and growing concerns about the role of aerosol transmission of COVID-19 in healthcare settings” at a time when the NHS is facing unprecedented pressure, BMA council chair Dr Chaand Nagpaul writes: “Now that we have been assured that supply is no longer an issue, we believe guidance should be updated to take a more precautionary approach to better protect those working on the frontline.”

Dr Nagpaul also warns that ensuring the appropriate level of protection is especially important to minimise the risk for staff who have a higher vulnerability to COVID-19 as he writes: “If healthcare workers fall ill from being infected and are unable to work, it will be devastating for the health service at this time of critical pressures, and it will compound the pressures besieging hospitals and GP practices.”

In addition, the BMA has also written to the Department of Health and Social Care2 urging that PPE provision must be adequate to meet the ‘diverse needs’ of the healthcare workforce.

Highlighting one of the issues raised by BMA members on the unsuitability of current PPE provision, Dr Nagpaul writes: “Female doctors are still struggling to find masks that fit, often failing the ‘fit test’ or being left with sores and ulcers after long shifts when wearing masks that did not fit. We have raised concerns in the past that PPE is designed to fit men, not women - despite the fact that 75% of the NHS workforce are women.”

Warning that the current ‘one-size-fits-all’ is ‘not appropriate’, Dr Nagpaul writes: “Guidance and provision must take account of differing needs of the individual healthcare worker - no matter who you are, you should have proper-fitting PPE, regardless of gender, ethnicity and religion.”

The BMA is asking that both issues be addressed as a matter of urgency.